

- AQUAMACS AUCTEX HOW TO
- AQUAMACS AUCTEX FOR MAC OS
- AQUAMACS AUCTEX INSTALL
- AQUAMACS AUCTEX FULL
- AQUAMACS AUCTEX CODE
AQUAMACS AUCTEX CODE
(all the code snippets from this post are available as a Github Gist) ( setq TeX-auto-save t ) ( setq TeX-parse-self t ) ( setq TeX-save-query nil ) (setq TeX-PDF-mode t) If it doesn’t happen, you can invoke it with M-x tex-mode, or you can put the following into your $HOME/.emacs file: Both Carbon Emacs and Aquamacs come with AUCTeX bundled, so there’s no need to download additional packages.Īfter running Emacs and loading a TeX file ( C-x C-f file_name.tex), AUCTeX should load itself automatically.
AQUAMACS AUCTEX FULL
Full comparison of Mac Emacs variants is available here, so you can make your own choice. Mac users have a choice of setting up either Carbon Emacs (a version closer to original GNU Emacs) or Aquamacs (an Emacs variant supporting tabs and other nice tweaks preferred Emacs package by all Mac users I know, Karolina included).
AQUAMACS AUCTEX HOW TO
Emacs is also available for Windows, and AUCTeX website has instructions on how to set it up with Windows systems.
AQUAMACS AUCTEX INSTALL
In Ubuntu, you just type sudo apt-get install emacs23 auctex and you’re laughing. Some of them are mine, but I can no longer tell which.įirst things first: you need to get Emacs and AUCTeX, and get it running.Įvery major linux distro comes with both Emacs and AUCTeX available via package systems. Most of these ideas are taken from various config files, howtos and other resources found on the web. I’d like to present some tips that customize Emacs making it a perfect and very sophisticated editor for LaTeX. However, once tamed, it becomes your best friend. Emacs has its complicated keyboard shortcuts, enormous documentation and config files written in a Lisp dialect (called Emacs lisp), so at first it might seem very unpleasant using it. The biggest problem with Emacs is that it’s not a particularly intuitive piece of software, to say the least, hence many users flee after their first encounter with it. Not everyone knows, though, that when you combine it with AUCTeX macros, it also becomes THE Best Editor for LaTeX. I’m sorry, but I can’t provide any support and won’t reply to emails about it.Įveryone knows, that GNU Emacs is THE Best Programmer’s Editor. There is also MonoDevelop/Xamarin if you want a more complete IDE which is better than anything I found for Haskell (but there maybe new stuff I'm missing, having messed with Haskell in a while) but SublimeText and Vim work fine.This article gets a lot of hits, but it’s been a while since I wrote it and I haven’t been using Emacs or LaTeX in years. I've been developing with F# for a while on the Mac and found no issues whatsoever. The main difference between those two answers is that for Haskell, the author pointed to generic Haskell resources while F# pointed to windows ones. Not sure about linux, but should be simple as well.Īnd as with Haskell and cabal, you have FAKE ( ) which isn't exactly the same but similar Personally though, I've grown more fond of F# than Haskell I only wish the documentation for Websharper and Funscript was more solid.

It has some changes however most notably it's strictly evaluated rather than lazy, and there are differences in how it handles type variables. Purescript is also gaining some traction and even has a pretty nice looking book out.
AQUAMACS AUCTEX FOR MAC OS
I used to get them from Emacs for Mac OS X, but now I use Homebrew, because it supports more libraries, notably GNU TLS for encrypted network connections.Īll in all: Use brew install emacs -HEAD -use-git-head -with-cocoa -with-gnutls -with-rsvg -with-imagemagick :). These have reasonably good OS X support, and are by far the easiest to install, and best supported by the community. Nowadays, I use just GNU Emacs snapshot builds. YMMV, obviously, and if you care for good OS X support, and if these features appeal to you, you should definitely try it. I did try Emacs Mac Port, and while smooth scrolling, gestures and Apple Events are nice, I found that these little benefits are not worth the hassle of keeping a patched version of GNU Emacs. Many packages don't support Aquamacs, so if there are issues, there's a good chance for you to be left alone as an Aquamacs user. I'd also recommend against the latter: It's a fork, and while it gives you best OS X integration, it inevitably lags behind, and receives less support from the Emacs community overall. I never tried Emacs for OS X Modified or Aquamacs, but I see little use in the former (I am no statistician, and can install AUCTeX by myself).
